Goodenough Gismo

  • Gismo39
    This is the classic children's book, Goodenough Gismo, by Richmond I. Kelsey, published in 1948. Nearly unavailable in libraries and the collector's market, it is posted here with love as an "orphan work" so that it may be seen and appreciated -- and perhaps even republished, as it deserves to be. After you read this book, it won't surprise you to learn that Richmond Irwin Kelsey (1905-1987) was an accomplished artist, or that as Dick Kelsey, he was one of the great Disney art directors, breaking your heart with "Pinocchio," "Dumbo," and "Bambi."



  • 74%How Addicted to Blogging Are You?





  • Google

Blogs I love and/or learn from

« Play Game, Feed People. | Main | "Independent Democrat" Joe Lieberman's Choice for President. »

Comments

reader_iam

I don't know if you went into Althouse's comments, or when, but I expressed some skepticism about this photo myself, and then I e-mailed to Ann a snapshot that I had taken of Sen. Clinton (with my son) in Davenport earlier this year (using a Coolpix 4600, not my iPhone, which I wasn't clear about but since have clarified in comments). Althouse updated to put up that picture (with my son cropped out, per my request) as a point of reference.

Pictures may paint a thousand words ... but it doesn't mean they're always true, or fair.

Icepick

You know I'm not a Hillary fan. I don't know what it would take to get me to vote for her. (Maybe if she was running against Tom DeLay? Or Al Sharpton?)

Or Mike Huckabee? ;)

PatHMV

I'm a bit perplexed by this, as Drudge has been rather fawning over Hillary these past many months. There have been several stories written suggesting that a close Hillary insider has been feeding him information, which he has used to their mutual advantage. I find it very odd that Drudge would post this photo today, with the headline he gave it. It's more than past time that Drudge himself be scrutinized, given how big a role he plays in driving news coverage these days.

Assuming the photo has not been edited to add wrinkles or whatever, I don't think that printing the photograph is wrong in any way. I like Fred Thompson, but I've seen him in many pictures and TV appearances looking even older than he is, and that makes me wonder whether he's up to the job. Certainly a great deal of attention was paid to Ronald Reagan's age and physical (and mental) ability during his campaign for reelection, at least until he famously defused it in the debate. It was an appropriate issue. At 60, though, age really shouldn't be an issue for Sen. Clinton.

By no means should one photo be the determining factor in any campaign. I was among the few wondering what the big deal was with the "Dean scream" last time.

I'm rambling a bit, amba, please forgive me. I am curious as to which precisely you find offensive, assuming that the photo is not doctored. Should the photo not have been taken? Should it not have been published by a news media? Would those be ok, but the line would be crossed if an opponent used it? Is the photo and its usage ok, but the Immodest Proposals blog discussion inappropriate?

Pastor_Jeff

The photo doesn't change how I think about Hillary. I was surprised at how she looked only because of the sharp contrast to the image she normally presents.

In some ways, she's getting the treatment every candidate gets -- the unflattering campaign photo (Bush as a chimp, Kerry in that clean suit/overall thing, Romney pulling on the glove in a fudge shop, etc.). But no doubt women are judged more harshly on their looks than are men.

realpc

It's easy to do anything you want with photos now. Hillary is in her 50s and that photo has the wrinkles of an 80-year-old. It's fake.

Icepick

I actually wouldn't be surprised if (a) the photo has NOT been doctored, and (b) it generally isn't reflective of her looks.

It looks like it's cold wherever that pic was taken, so it her face may be more scrunched up than normal. The cold may be effecting whatever kind of makeup whe's wearing (I assume some sort of pancake-type, but that's just a guess) and the cold may be affecting that to highlight "flaws" rather than hide them. The pic appears to have been snapped while she was both turning her head and speaking. Her face is in a transitional expression, which isn't going to be all that attractive in any event.

Also note that the scarf is pushing up flesh that would normally be hanging naturally and smoothing out a lot of smaller wrinkles on her face below her eyes. She appears to have pulled her chin inwards too, which combined with the scarf would really impact how her flesh hangs. Compare with the pic Reader snapped, in which Hillary's chin is thrust out & up. Her cheek bones are much more prominent in that picture. I suspect that this picture is legit, but unfortunate.

Of course, it also won't be a surprise to find out it's been doctored. ("Let's get real, here!" as a frined likes to say.)

Icepick

What will be devasting, though, is when someone combines this pick with Hillary's laughter from the debate a few days ago - the one where the moderator was asking Obama how he could bring change if he was reliant on so many old Clinton hands.

Unfortunately, these things do have an impact. People get judged on their looks, demeanor, speaking vocie, etc. Lincoln could never get elected in today's political environment.

amba

Pat --

I am most offended by Immodest Proposals' remarks. Why seeing Hillary looking her age, or older, should torpedo her campaign is beyond me. As many commenters on Althouse have said, anyone can have an unflattering photograph taken. Large sections of all the tabloids are devoted to "gotcha" photographs of (female) celebrities' cellulite. To scrutinize a presidential candidate as if she were Britney Spears is just so puerile and hyena-like.

The optimum years for serious political power are probably the 50s, 60s, and early 70s, which combine continued vigor and mental sharpness with experience, perspective, even wisdom, and accumulated contacts, debts, and chits!!

PatHMV

I can agree with that.

Ruth Anne

Her lipstick looks fabulous. It's crisp and not feathering around the edges and looks shiny-smooth. The make-up looks freshly applied, too. I think the cold weather/excess travel is causing her skin to be drier than normal, thus the appearance of more lines than in Reader's photo at the start of the campaign. She probably needs an excellent eye cream, frequently applied, and a couple good nights of uninterrupted sleep. She should probably cut out coffee/other caffeinated drinks and just plump up that skin by drinking lots of clean water.

I think she just looks weary.

realpc

She is running for president, not entering a beauty pageant. So I don't understand why the photo matters. No one complains that John McCain isn't pretty enough to be president.

Meade

That's because John McCain IS pretty enough to be president.

Ruth Anne

Hillary looked good here.

Ruth Anne

Who's the stoner she's with?

Simon

My only real point of departure from the consensus is that while I think Ruth Anne's correct about it mainly being a question of too little sleep and too much stress (and one can't rule out the possibility of photoshop), there seems to be a tacit assumption under the "does this hurt her" question that she actually looks bad (if not, why in the world would it hurt her), and as I've said in other places, I think she looks attractive even in this pic. /shrug/

Simon

Ruth Anne, I believe that's Sully that she's with.

Sissy Willis

It's helpful to think of Maggie Thatcher and the late Jean Kirkpatrick in this context. They have/had an inner glow that age can not whither, nor custom stale. Hillary's dead eyes betray a person of "no scruples or ideals whatsoever," as Eric of Classical Values writes today.

Icepick

Ruth Anne, you appear to be channeling Maxine Weiss.

Sissy Willis wrote: It's helpful to think of Maggie Thatcher and the late Jean Kirkpatrick in this context. They have/had an inner glow that age can not whither, nor custom stale. Hillary's dead eyes betray a person of "no scruples or ideals whatsoever," as Eric of Classical Values writes today.

Please, this is just silly. Her eyes aren't 'dead'. She's mid-blink and turning from the camera. Judging anyone's appearance by one snapshot, especially an unflattering one, is asinine. I'm sure that unflattering pictures of Kirkpatrick and Thatcher exist, perhaps even pictures where the subjects have the dreaded red-eye.

Hillary has a long track record. THAT'S where we should look to judge if she's fit to be President, not one bad snapshot.

Meade

"Ruth Anne, you appear to be channeling Maxine Weiss."

*snort, chuckle, chortle*

Ruth Anne

Icepick: Perhaps so, but Maxine cannot do an embedded link to save her life, so it's obviously not her.

Icepick

Icepick: Perhaps so, but Maxine cannot do an embedded link to save her life, so it's obviously not her.

True. But understand that the lack of puns is really disorienting.

amba

A pun is your calling card.

Ruth Anne

Is that all I am to you? Just a play-on-wordstress? I'll have you know I learned skin care and make-up artistry with the best. I can comment on this with some authority. Gawd, man, my sister drives a pink Cadillac!

Merely punny? That's puny.

Icepick

No one said puns were the ONLY thing you do, just that they're your calling card.

Mom

Does anyone remember Golda Meier? (sp?) Who put appearance ahead of competence in her case? I am not making a pitch for Ms. Clinton--merely for simple sanity and justice! Get off the Womean's Looks Bandwagon, everyone!

amba

And, she was played by Ingrid Bergman in a movie or TV-movie or miniseries -- a marvelous piece of casting against type!

Sissy Willis

Icepick: I'm not talking about that one picture. I'm talking about 13 years of studying the woman's words and actions. She sold her soul years ago.

RC

Or what about having to see someone like Obama on the news for the next 4 years. . .the man is ugly as hell. I’d much rather see Hillary on the news for the next 4 years. Is Obama sick or something? He’s been looking malnourished lately. Somebody really should tell that gawd ugly man to eat a little more. He reminds me of one of those Egyptian mummies after they take all the wrappings off, showing leathery black skin on a skeleton.

reader_iam

Apparently, the photo in question was one of a series--of nine, if I counted correctly--in a Reuters photostream. (Cal e-mailed me, once he discovered it, bless him.) None of the rest look like that.

amba

Wow. Do you have a link?

reader_iam

E-mailed you.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

New on FacTotem, my Natural History Blog

Jacques' Story: Escape From the Gulag

The AmbivAbortion Rant

Debating Intelligent Design

Ecosystem


  • Listed on Blogwise

Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 08/2004