Ex-Congressman Foley says he was molested by a priest. Why did I see this coming? I thought, "Foley's an Irish name, he's Catholic, he's going to blame it all on the priest who seduced him when he was a lad." (I do wish I'd written it down.)
Now the "values crowd" -- or wait, I'm getting confused, is it the "anti-religion crowd"? -- can start a diversionary debate on whether homosexual seduction at a critical age turns a boy gay, or whether it only gives an already gay boy a time-bomb taste for tender young flesh when he's priest age.
Jeez, it's really confusing which way this scandal cuts.
Kind of hits all the bases, doesn't it?
Posted by: Walrus | October 04, 2006 at 11:27 AM