I'm waiting for an anthropologist to disquire (I've deduced that that's the verb for "disquisition") on the culture of this strange archipelago, the blogosphere. I'll bet somewhere in academia, one or more are at it already. The 'sphere will have its Margaret Mead, who visits different island societies floating in the virtual sea and documents how, in isolation from one another, they diverge and develop strikingly different subcultures -- the armed and hostile headhunters, the gentle agrarians -- and then how the occasional winged seed cross-fertilizes and revitalizes. (I like to think that we centrist bloggers are the canoe-borne traders, or even the hardy wind-borne pests, that keep the left and right island chains from becoming too inbred and vitiated.)
However, we're still relatively close to the Big Bang of the blogosphere's origin. As a relative newcomer I'm surprised (though I shouldn't be) that it has such a distinct and consistent culture, and also surprised by my own urge to fall in with it. Blogging is an individualistic activity, and people could just do it any old way they wanted, so why do we all say "Hat tip" when we want to acknowledge whoever pointed us in a cool direction, and "Heh" when something merits a snarky snicker? (I must be in the "Why?" stage -- a toddler blogger.) Who started those customs, anyway? Our anthropologist will no doubt find that the blogosphere has its own ethics and etiquette, and perhaps that the courteous exchange of links and invitations, and the ritualized acknowledgements and expressions of gratitude, conform to the lineaments of gift exchange described by seminal French ethnologist Marcel-Israël Mauss (1872-1950), nephew of Emile Durkheim:
Mauss's most influential work is his Essay sur le don (1923–24; English translation: The Gift. Forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies, 1954), a comparative essay on gift-giving and exchange in "primitive" societies. On the basis of empirical examples from a wide range of societies, Mauss describes the obligations attendent on gift-giving: the obligation to give gifts (by giving, one shows oneself as generous, and thus as deserving of respect), the obligation to receive them (by receiving the gift, one shows respect to the giver, and concommittantly proves one's own generocity), and the obligation to return the gift (thus demonstrating that one's honor is - at least - equivalent to that of the original giver). Gift-giving is thus steeped in morality, and by giving, receiving and returning gifts, a moral bond between the persons exchanging gifts. At the same time, Mauss emphasizes the competitive and strategic aspect of gift-giving: by giving more than one's competitors, one lays claim to greater respect than them, and gift-giving contests (such as the famous North-West Coast Native American potlatch), are thus common in the ethnographic record. . . .
The objects and services exchanged in "primitive" gift-giving are, as Mauss points out, thus laden with "power" (the Polynesian words mana and hau are used to refer to this "power in the gift"). Though a similar "power" is present to a certain extent in modern gifts as well, Mauss shows that gifts in traditional societies are more complex and multivalent than anything we know from modern society. The gift, as Mauss sees it, is more than a simple commodity or memento changing hands - it is a "total prestation" (préstation totale), which metonymically (as part for whole) stands for every aspect of the society it is part of. The gift is economic, political, kinship-oriented, legal, mythological, religious, magical, practical, personal and social. By moving such an object through the social landscape, the gift-giver so to speak rearranges the fabric of sociality - and it is this that forms the basis of the gift's power.
Let's try a simple substitution: "The link is economic, political, kinship-oriented, legal, mythological, religious, magical, practical, personal and social. By moving such an object through the virtual landscape, the link-giver so to speak rearranges the fabric of sociality - and it is this that forms the basis of the link's power."
There you have the beginnings of an anthropology of the blogosphere.
- amba
P.S. Dave Schuler of The Glittering Eye offers us a little ethnographic history of blogging's origins in the "gift culture" of the Open Source movement.
UPDATE: The "Carnival of the Vanities," the brainstorm of Bigwig at Silflay Hraka -- for which I have a special affection, as the first blog I ever linked to and the ritual bestower of my first link -- and all its Carnival offspring are nothing other than potlatches: big link giveaways that bloggers vie to host, for all those reasons -- the prestige, the exposure, the friendship, the curiosity, the pleasure, in no particular order.
UPDATE II: PunditGuy is hosting the 127th potlatch -- er, Carnival -- right now.
As I'm sure you know the blogosphere owes its gift culture aspects to the Open Source movement in which it had its origin and which pre-dated it by more than a decade.
Posted by: Dave Schuler | February 20, 2005 at 09:36 AM
Here's an article I received this morning from my alma mater on this subject:
http://www.buffalo.edu/news/fast-execute.cgi/article-page.html?article=71440009
Posted by: Tamar | February 20, 2005 at 10:08 AM
I agree. I wrote several times about it. I also love the "Apophenia" blog as it studies this kind of stuff (you can find the link on my blogroll).
Blog Carnivals
Blogging
Posted by: coturnix | February 22, 2005 at 05:21 PM
As a student of both anthropology and photography I am willing to bet that there is someone on it already. The competition will be fierce when they launch( these anthropological blogs of substance.
And as I pointed out for no reason yesterday in my blog, Maggie Mead was rumored to be lazy so hopefully those that decide to use their academic credentials to do an investigative and or ethographics on the blogesphere will not be so.
Posted by: cooper | May 10, 2005 at 06:46 PM
As a former Anthro major I see a lot of cargo-cult activity, what is really interesting to me is the archaeological aspects - the bones are fresh. ;-)
Posted by: DirtCrashr | August 09, 2006 at 07:34 PM
I like your e-mail "address."
You should write a post expanding on that comment!
Posted by: amba | August 09, 2006 at 08:11 PM
I've been away from it for quite a while, but my first thought was for the Internet in general rather than the Blogosphere, with Usenet being the lower archaeological strata, the parent-bones.
Was it a Big-Bang that started it, or a fiery meteoric paradigm-shift that crashed to earth? Is Athena the BlogGoddess who sprung forth from Zeusnet's splitting headache, and if so where is her Wisdom?
We could have a lot of fun with metaphors.
The highly competitive gift-giving of the later Potlatch tradition was economically crushing to most of the communities that participated, decimating some of them - and one of the first cases revealed by Academe of unintended consequences. That's a bit of an institutional bogyman, unintended consequences, it doesn't fit well within the settled framework of stately theorems balancing equally and diversely on victims' heads.
I'm on a couple blog-rolls that have expanded in size beyond the ability of the people to cope, and an ad-hoc Carnival that without on individual's leadership is on shaky ground.
So what are the cargo-cults? Sites promoted by conspiracy-theorists among others, things that have the semblance of science but are not - a bamboo stick looks like a radio antenna but it's not, and a white lab-coat doesn't make you an M.D. - that sort of thing.
As far as Ethnography goes, it's all about sex - the diary of Malinowski's reveals he was basically a horn-dog on a remote island. A huge percent of the Internet is devoted to sex, and the Blogosphere reflects that as well. Maybe we should acknowledge all those early, pioneering AOLers who as joke goes, "How can you tell if it's winter or summer on AOL? Whether they're wearing socks or not." Before there were Bloggers in Pajamas there were cyber-primitives with none. If Al Gore started this thing, than I imagine he was among them! Poor Tipper. ;-) The pornographers are the ones that first built bandwidth in order to bring us (HOT-HOT!) interactive streaming video, and took VOIP And pushed it so we could talk to HOT CHICKS! They actually helped defined how much of the architecture in place would work going forward - stuff now used innocently (more or less) at YouTube. Hmm... maybe that is an appropriate area for "field work," if you're a BlogSophomore? College is ubiquitous, in memory anyhow.
Thanks for letting me ramble. :-)
Posted by: DirtCrashr | August 10, 2006 at 11:56 AM