Goodenough Gismo

  • Gismo39
    This is the classic children's book, Goodenough Gismo, by Richmond I. Kelsey, published in 1948. Nearly unavailable in libraries and the collector's market, it is posted here with love as an "orphan work" so that it may be seen and appreciated -- and perhaps even republished, as it deserves to be. After you read this book, it won't surprise you to learn that Richmond Irwin Kelsey (1905-1987) was an accomplished artist, or that as Dick Kelsey, he was one of the great Disney art directors, breaking your heart with "Pinocchio," "Dumbo," and "Bambi."



  • 74%How Addicted to Blogging Are You?





  • Google

Blogs I love and/or learn from

« June 10, 2007 - June 16, 2007 | Main | June 24, 2007 - June 30, 2007 »

Knight Exchange. [UPDATED]

Eteraz reports that the Pakistani Ulema Council ("a leading group of Islamic scholars") has now "knighted" Osama bin Laden with the title "Saifullah," or Sword of God, in (partial) retaliation for the knighting by Queen Elizabeth of Salman Rushdie.

Thereby ennobling his many thousands of murders of innocents and equating them with Rushdie's many thousands of words of mockery.  Like words balance sticks and stones and bombs and beheadings.  Like ink on your hands is worse than blood, and deserves blood.

How pathetic and impotent are those who cannot create and can only destroy.

UPDATE:  Comment of the Year Award (invented on the spot) goes to Rick Robotham, DVM:

this ceremony will terminate with the "Saifulla" (Sword of god)
being inserted (with vigor) downward - anterior
to the shoulder bone - posterior to the clavicle - 3 cm's lateral the neck - and down a meter - into his place, the void, were a heart and soul should exist.

To Get To the Other Side.

What is the question, Mr. Question Man?*

Why did the chicken hop aboard the Ikit-Nok?  (Kon-Tiki backwards, for reasons that will momentarily become clear.)

When Francisco Pizarro got to Peru in 1532, before betraying and murdering his host Atahualpa, he recorded the presence of domestic chickens, and their thorough integration into both Incan cuisine and ritual.  Yet for almost 500 years, historians continued to insist that chickens must have hitched a ride to the New World aboard the Niña, the Pinta, and the Santa Maria. Which gives them only forty years to hustle from the Caribbean over to the west coast of South America and make themselves indispensable to Incan culture.  Not very believable.  What were they thinking?

Now, a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Auckland, New Zealand named Alice A. Storey has pretty conclusively proven that Polynesians reached the Pacific coast of South America well before the Spanish or the Portuguese, bringing chickens with them.   Remember Kon-Tiki?  Thor Heyerdahl had it backwards; it wasn't the South Americans who sailed west on a balsa wood raft. 

How did young Alice do it?  She took a chicken bone from an archaeological site in south central Chile; radiocarbon-dated it back to the 14th century, a hundred or so years before Columbus; and sequenced its mitochondrial DNA.  One key sequence was identical to its counterpart in chicken bones from digs in Tonga and American Samoa.  (Imagine hitting the jackpot like that before you even had your Ph.D.!)

Conversely, sweet potatoes and gourds from South America apparently traveled the other way, brought back by the seafarers.

Alice and her equally young and pretty mentor, Lisa Matisoo-Smith, are "biological anthropologists" who are tracing the routes of human migration by studying the ancient and modern DNA of "commensal" animals, those that live and travel with us -- whether they're domesticated like chickens, horses, dogs, and pigs, or freeloaders like rats and lice.  The domestic chicken is thought to be descended from wild species in the forests of the Indian subcontinent.   From there, it seems to have spread gradually eastward, across Southeast Asia, out into Oceania and on across the Pacific.

Copyediting science articles is so cool.

*Mr. Question Man:

TOM POSTON, COMEDIAN: It was only a few short weeks ago that we introduced the Question Man to the nation. But even in that short period of time, he has managed to creep into the hearts of America.

     And now, I'd like to have you meet this creep, the Question Man. 

     A listener from Montana sends in this interesting answer. Vanguard one, Jupiter two.  The question, please?

     STEVE ALLEN:  What was the final score in the Vanguard/Jupiter game.       I think we have time for no more, or one more. 

     POSTON:  Just one more.  Butterfield 8, 3,000.  Question, please?

     STEVE ALLEN:  How many hamburgers did Butterfield eat?

     (END VIDEO CLIP)

ALLEN: President Kennedy's favorite joke, he told Peter Lawford, was from that show, where one night Tom Poston read the answer to Steve. The answer was, "Chicken Teriyaki."

     And the question Steve divined was, "Name the oldest living kamikaze pilot."
         

President Marx, Meet President Faust.

What's this?  A certain kind of paranoid would not find it coincidental.  Is the Ivy League getting ready for the Antichrist?  Godless communism . . . vaunting science . . .

That's Anthony Marx of Amherst, and Drew Gilpin Faust of Harvard.  Funny!  Creepy!

The Vatican Addresses a Profound Problem of Our Time . . .

Road rage!

A 36-page document called "Guidelines for the Pastoral Care of the Road" contains 10 Commandments covering everything from road rage, respecting pedestrians, keeping a car in good shape and avoiding rude gestures while behind the wheel.

"Cars tend to bring out the 'primitive' side of human beings, thereby producing rather unpleasant results," the document said.

It appealed to what it called the "noble tendencies" of the human spirit, urging responsibility and self-control to prevent the "psychological regression" often associated with driving.

The document's Fifth Commandment reads: "Cars shall not be for you an expression of power and domination, and an occasion of sin".

Asked at a news conference when a car became an occasion of sin, Cardinal Renato Martino said "when a car is used as a place for sin".

(I think teen-agers should get an indulgence for that one.  But it turns out they mainly mean prostitution.)

One part of the document, under the section "Vanity and personal glorification", will not go down well with owners of Ferraris and other luxury cars in motor-mad Italy.

"Cars particularly lend themselves to being used by their owners to show off, and as a means for outshining other people and arousing a feeling of envy," it said.

It urged readers not to behave in an "unsatisfactory and even barely human manner" when driving and to avoid what it called "unbalanced behaviour... impoliteness, rude gestures, cursing, blasphemy".

Praying while driving was encouraged.

This came from the Vatican's office for migrants and itinerant people:

Cardinal Renato Martino, who heads the office, told a news conference the Vatican felt it necessary to address the pastoral needs of motorists because driving has become such a big part of contemporary life.

He cited World Health Organization statistics that said an estimated 1.2 million people are killed in road crashes each year and as many as 50 million are injured.

"That's a sad reality, and at the same time, a great challenge for society and the church," he said.

He noted that the Bible was full of people on the move, including Mary and Joseph, the parents of Jesus - and that his office is tasked with dealing with all "itinerant" people on the roads - from refugees to prostitutes, truck drivers and the homeless.

The document, "Guidelines for the Pastoral Care of the Road," extols the benefits of driving - family outings, getting the sick to the hospital, allowing people to get to work and seeing other cultures.

But it laments a host of ills associated with automobiles.

I find it sweet, somehow, that the Vatican is willing to carry the holy war against the "primitive," "barely human" side of human beings into as homely a place as the car.  It's an example of both the adaptability and the lowliness, in a good sense, of Catholicism -- like Talmudic Judaism, willing to wade into everyday life up to its armpits and do its work there.

H/T:  The Anchoress.  (Noteworthy in the same post:  "the UN’s inexorable move toward criminalizing any criticism of Islam.")

Older: Better.

[Posted in honor of the great service Ronni Bennett does at Time Goes By.]

My parents are clearing out the Chicago apartment they've rented for the last three decades, ever since the last great clearing-out, when -- four of six kids out of the nest -- they sold their house and took my brothers to Mexico for a year.

No sad reason for doing it now.  Once again, a kid -- their grandchild Molly -- has flown the nest, and her mom, my sister Martha, who'd lived in the apartment for several years and shared it with our parents when they returned from Florida for the summers, has remarried and moved to her own place.  Rather than return to the dreadful hassle of locking everything away and renting the place to strangers for the academic year (it's near the University of Chicago), my parents decided to let it go and rent something transient and furnished for their summer months back north.

There is a whole wall of books, and more, some of them first editions and banned books by Henry Miller and Frank Harris collected in Paris in the ''30s by my father's mother, a bookseller and all-around book freak.  There are boxes and file cabinets bursting with letters from ancestors, grandparents, my father's brother who died in WWII, all of us, and our generation's kids.  There are camp and high school yearbooks, memorabilia and memorial announcements from departed friends, and, not least, tchotchkes.  Faced with the monumental task of disposing of all this -- sorting, distributing, discarding -- my parents hired a pro, a "personal organizer" found through my sister's yoga teacher.  That has left them lighthearted and even enthusiastic about the task.

Well, I'll tell you.  Everybody should do this -- distribute their stuff while they're still alive!  Another sister, who's flying into Chicago tomorrow, asked me whether it wasn't sad and heavy and momentous, dismantling that apartment.  I told her, on the contrary.  My mom (83) is filled with effervescent zest, seeming to grow lighter and stronger with each object she gives or throws away.  (I hope I'm able to do that someday. I am very far from it now.  In fact, age-appropriately, I was growing heavier, taking on five boxes of the stuff she was unburdening herself of.)  My job was to go through the books and choose from them first, since I'm designated heir to the book lust of my grandmother.  I got to take books to the table, ask and talk about them with my mom and dad; puzzle over a translated letter by a 19th-century ancestor in Germany petitioning to change his name because Salomon Kupfer was too Jewish and was hurting his fine tailoring trade; marvel at the elegant sentences picked out letter by letter from a Lucite frame with his eyes by my dad's army buddy, silenced thirty-five years ago by Lou Gehrig's disease; retell favorite jokes and memories.  So far from being a sad ritual, it was a festive and commemorative one, because we did it together.  I can't recommend it strongly enough, if you're lucky enough to have the chance.

Although I've posted some of the rants of comic outrage I wrote about a decade ago, confronted with the rude reality of no longer being young,  this weekend drove home to me that I sure as hell wouldn't want to be young again.  I couldn't believe the bags full of letters and, later, journals I wrote to relieve the pressure of self-doubt and ambition and longing that fills young people the way juice fills a ripe peach.  "No wonder I'm so taciturn now," I laughed to my mom.  (I am, believe it or not, in person and on the phone; I mostly listen.)  "I have nothing left to say!"  Inspired by my grandmother's trove of literary erotica, I coined a term for that sort of awful archives:  NEUROTICA.  I can't throw it all out -- yet -- and why?  Because here and there in the midst of the snoresome obsessing I said something really funny.  For the sake of one good joke I shall save the shitty.

What was all that about?  What on earth made life and relationships (like, with my parents) so fraught and problematic?  I can't even remember!  It all seems to have burned off and boiled away, revealing the bonds like bones in their clean white simplicity.  Why do we humans create so many problems for ourselves, an obstacle course to clamber over on the way to (if we're lucky) the open, uncluttered space of older age?  You have to laugh.  It's like a huge joke you played on yourself.  Like the Michael Douglas movie "The Game." 

It really is better to be older.  And looking at my mom and dad, I think that, with a little bit of luck, it will be even better to be even older.  Less cartilage, less lung capacity, less hormones -- all worth it:  less bullshit!             

"The Least Popular President Since Nixon."

In a Newsweek poll:

Positive:  26 percent.

Negative:  65 percent.

George W. Bush has passed Jimmy Carter (28 percent, 1979) on the down staircase to the Inferno of presidential disgrace.

At last, he draws near to the gold standard, the blue-stubbled, cold-sweated, beady-eyed Platonic ideal of Hate To the Chief.  (23 percent, 1974.)

But, just as a "normal curve" plotted on a graph can endlessly approach but never touch the axis, he can never get there.

As Fred Heats Up, Oppo Research Does Too. [UPDATED]

I saw this in Politico last week.  It takes on new relevance now that Fred Thompson has taken the lead in a Rasmussen poll, edging (in statistical terms, really tying) Rudy Giuliani without even officially entering the GOP race.  Since the elephant is wandering like Diogenes with lifted lantern, looking for a true conservative, it's that moderate underbelly he's always looking to shed his light on:

Opponents and their researchers have begun working -- mostly behind the scenes -- to highlight perceived soft spots in [Thompson's] conservative bona fides[: ...] his centrist votes in the Senate, his stances on litmus test conservative issues including abortion and -- perhaps most significantly -- his work as a lawyer and lobbyist. [...]

  • Lobbyist: Thompson made nearly $1.3 million over about two decades of lobbying both before and after his eight-year Senate stint [...] Some of [his] clients could prove tricky to explain, from a British reinsurance company facing billions of dollars in asbestos claims to deposed Haitian President Jean-Bertrand Aristide. [...]
  • Trial lawyer: Before Thompson won his Senate seat, published reports said his private law practice handled personal injury cases and defended people accused of white-collar crimes. And in the Senate, he opposed some legislation intended to rein in escalating jury verdicts and attorneys' fees. [...]
  • Campaign finance reformer: Thompson was among the leading Republican backers of the sweeping package of campaign finance reforms commonly known as McCain-Feingold. [...C]onservative activists have derided it as an infringement on their free speech [...] Expect conservative groups and rivals to emphasize Thompson's support for the bill, even calling it "McCain-Feingold-
    Thompson." [...]
  • Centrist senator: [...H]e backed a 1998 bill that would have established a temporary farm worker program and a 1996 bill to increase the minimum wage. And he voted against one of the two impeachment charges brought against President Clinton in 1999.
  • Abortion-rights supporter: Every time Thompson got the chance in the Senate, he voted with those who oppose abortion rights. But [...o]n candidate surveys in 1994 and 1996, he answered that he favored abortion always being legal in the first trimester of pregnancy and opposed [a "Human Life"] amendment to the U.S. Constitution [...] "I do not believe abortion should be criminalized. This battle will be won in the hearts and souls of the American people."

This is just a digest, read the whole thing -- it includes the Thompson camp's likely defense against each of these insinuations, some of which, it cannot be escaping party strategists, are the very things that might protect Thompson from Dem charges of extremism and give him traction in the wider world of a general election, beyond "the base."

His lobbying, on the other hand, could continue to haunt Thompson, although his people will counter that he didn't do all that much of it:

Thompson spokesman Mark Corallo called the list "incredibly old news and incredibly stale news" and stressed that lobbying was but a small part of Thompson's legal practice.

"He had a law practice for over 30 years and he had about half a dozen lobbying clients," Corallo said.

UPDATE:  In the comments, Michael's savory characterization of Thompson's appeal:  "Bullshit gravitas."

In a time when perception that leads to feeling good -- inspired, reassured -- has substituted for substance, that's strong stuff.

Stab victim 'continued masturbating'

She thought he was a "tolerably decent person" when he wasn't on drugs, but when Kylie Louise Wilson's boyfriend took amphetamines and went on a naked masturbation binge all over her apartment -- including in front of her 3 1/2-year-old daughter -- Wilson repeatedly asked Daniel Peter Blair to stop, and when he wouldn't, got a knife from the kitchen and stabbed him twice in the shoulder.

Blair ran bleeding out of the house to wait for police and went on masturbating in the garage.  Ain't drugs grand?

This happened in Brisbane, Australia.  The judge was a bit of a King Solomon in the case:

Wilson pleaded guilty to one count each of unlawful wounding and wilful damage. [...]

Senior Judge Gilbert Trafford Walker accepted the Crown's submission that Wilson had been subjected to "grossly offensive conduct ... which in a moral sense amounts to extreme provocation."

He sentenced her to nine months' jail but ordered that she be immediately released on parole.

Quite rightly, as she, too, showed forbearance under duress:  they didn't have to fish it out of the grass like John Bobbitt's.  Lucky guy stiff.

Priorities

Now why the hell did I get 92 hits in the last hour? 

Hint:  they're all on the same post.  I guess the word has leaked out.

Give humans freedom of speech and they'll stick their heads between their legs.  Give them freedom from want, and their number one dream goal will be . . . to lose weight.

Depressing.

Vagina On My Mind [UPDATED]

I don't get it.  This "vortex" thing over at Althouse.  At all.  (Saying this, of course, immediately makes me part of it.  It's the Tar Baby.)  It's sort of like the food fight in "Animal House."

[Digression:

Apparently, food fights are becoming something of an epidemic at at least one particular Montreal high school, and officials are blaming the proliferation of food-based warfare on the internet. It seems that these "wild and crazy" high school kids are setting up food fights via the internet and taping them. They then upload the videos of their food blowouts to the video hosting site "YouTube" and then share the video links with friends and other high schoolers. This has created a rivalry situation between different neighboring schools, with students at one high school aiming to out-do students at another. [...]

[T]hese food fights are something that some people consider a right-of-passage [... I]f these food firing students had used good old fashioned word-of-mouth to set up their food-based melees, it very likely wouldn't have garnered nearly as much attention as it has.

A right of passage.  Therefore, something else everyone is entitled to, like social promotion.  Geee-eesh.  Sound effect of tooth-grinding.]

Anyway, the "vortex" looks to me like a big pile of rubbish, the main point of which is that it towers very, very high.  But that's it.  But there are all these people wallowing around in there, like an orgy or a cat fight in a cartoon -- big drops of wet and punctuation gone AWOL from its expletives flying out.  Over what?? 

The Internet brings out the worst in high school?  The Internet is high school!

Rummaging briefly in this heaving haystack before going away shaking my head, my magpie eye caught one shining needle:

In the whole history of the world, if there is one person for whom a cigar was not just a cigar, it's Bill Clinton.

That's a keeper.  They can keep the rest.

UPDATE:  Ah, okay.  Now it's becoming a little clearer what that was all about, besides the fact that Americans are still puerile enough to get all worked up and sniggery over sexual innuendo and imagery.

I now know that what sets the left blogosphere into intense, concerted action is calling attention to Bill Clinton's old sexual problems. I wonder why.

That "I wonder why" is rhetorical.   Ann  says she knows why:  Bill's crotch is Hillary's Achilles heel.  Ergo, a sore spot for those who wish to promote and protect her.

You think?  Or was it just a food fight?

(Later) Whatever, it has actually crystallized something for me, and that is the awareness of just how much inescapable baggage Hillary has in the baggy form of Bill.

My Photo

New on FacTotem, my Natural History Blog

The AmbivAbortion Rant

Debating Intelligent Design

Ecosystem


  • Listed on Blogwise

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 08/2004